Court Quashes N322m Fraud Case Against Sen. Nwaoboshi


A Federal High Court, on Friday, has dismissed N322million fraud case against incumbent Senator, representing Delta North Senatorial District in the Senate, Peter Nwaoboshi instituted by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke held that the agency failed to prove the elements of the offences for which it charged the lawmaker.

The judge also discharged Nwaoboshi’s two firms – Golden Touch Construction Project Ltd and Suiming Electrical Ltd – on the same ground.

Justice Aneke held, among others, that the prosecution’s case collapsed because “bank officials were not called to testify.

Recall that The New Diplomat had earlier reported how the trial of Peter Nwaoboshi, a Peoples’ Democratic Party, (PDP) senator, began in 2018 at the Lagos Division of the Federal High Court with the prosecution presenting two witnesses.

The lawmaker was charged with two counts alongside two firms – Golden Touch Construction Project Limited and Suiming Electricals Limited.

Count one of the charge accused the senator and Golden Touch Construction Project Ltd of fraudulently acquiring a property known as Guinea House situated at Marine Road, Apapa in Lagos, between May and June 2014, at a cost N805 million.

READ ALSO:   EFCC: P&ID Bribed Ex-Petroleum Ministry’s Legal Director with $21,000

The charge stated that the defendants ought to have known that N322 million out of the purchase price formed part of the proceeds of an unlawful act under the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act.

Count two of the charge accused Suiming Electricals of aiding Mr Nwaoboshi and Golden Touch Construction Projects Ltd to commit money laundering.

Prince Kpokpogiri, the prosecution’s first witness, said he wrote a petition to the EFCC after he had received an anonymous call and some documents at his office in Asaba, Delta State.

He said he was subsequently invited by the EFCC to Abuja to come and adopt the petition.

The witness said he runs a nongovernmental organisation, Anti-Corruption and Integrity Forum, as well as a real estate firm, P.K Aro Multiservices Nigeria Limited.

During cross examination, the witness said his petition did not contain a list of the firm’s Board of Directors because it was not mandatory.

He also said it was not his duty to investigate the contents of his petition before forwarding to the EFCC.

READ ALSO:   N2m Fraud: How Fraudsters Cloned Ex-Custom’s Boss Aide’s Phone

“I only investigated by going through the documents. I did not contact the defendants because it is the work of the EFCC.”

Anthony Idigbe, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, (SAN) accused the witness of being an agent of the EFCC.

“I also put it to you that apart from the fact that you did not investigate the documents, you did not also take any step to verify the facts stated in the petition,” Mr Idigbe said.

While giving his evidence, Murtala Abubakar, the prosecution’s second witness, said Suiming Electricals Limited, the third defendant, applied for a loan at the Nigerian Export Import Bank in December 2013, and it was approved in April 2014.

Mr Abubakar, the head of Enterprise Risk Management unit at the bank, said Mr Nwaoboshi was a former board member of the bank.

He also said that while the meeting to take a decision on the loan request was being held, Mr Nwaoboshi indicated his interest in the transaction and was recused from the deliberation.

READ ALSO:   EFCC Re-arraigns Orji Kalu

The senator is a director at Bildeberg, a holding company which has the majority shareholding in Suiming Electricals Nigeria Limited.

Mr Abubakar said the EFCC made five requests to the bank on Suiming Electricals, starting from June 2017, in respect of the loan transaction granted to the company.

He further stated that the company met all the bank’s conditions before the loan was disbursed.

The witness said although the third defendant had repaid over ₦1 billion of the loan, it is still a non-performing one.

“The loan facility is for five years,” Mr Abubakar said.

“There is a difference between paying and performing. When we give a loan, we give you a payment plan. When you are supposed to be paying ₦1 million quarterly but you are paying ₦200,000, you are paying but you are not performing.”

The EFCC however, requested for an adjournment to enable it assemble its remaining four witnesses and the judge fixed July 2nd and 3rd for continuation of trial.

Subscribe to Our VIP Newsletter


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here