Why I Won’t Set Up Panel to Investigate Fubara, Deputy– Rivers Chief Judge Replies Assembly

Cat:

Related stories

How Much Gas Prices Have Risen Since the Iran War

Key Takeaways U.S. gas prices have risen about 44%...

Tinubu Orders Forensic Audit of IPPIS, Federal Agencies Over Payroll Fraud

By Nwosa Hamilton President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has directed a...

“I’ve Evidence Tinubu is 90 Years Old, And I’ll Present in Court,” Atiku Claims

By Abiola Olawale Former Vice President and African Democratic Congress...

(VIDEO) Outrage as Nwebonyi Campaigns for Votes Across a River with No Bridge in Ebonyi

https://youtu.be/M70fofT515w?si=914s8kMpIdKaeeO0 By Abiola Olawale A recent campaign outing by Senator Peter...

Oil Prices Head for a Weekly Loss Despite Escalating Iran Tensions

Crude oil prices were on course to book another...

By Abiola Olawale

Rivers State Chief Judge, Justice Simeon Chibuzor Amadi, has formally declined the request by the State House of Assembly to constitute a seven-man investigative panel against Governor Siminalayi Fubara and his deputy, Professor Ngozi Odu.

​The refusal, communicated in a letter dated January 20, 2026, and made public on Thursday, January 22, marks a major setback for the Martins Amaewhule-led House of Assembly in their ongoing bid to oust the state’s top executives.

​The Chief Judge’s decision stems from a subsisting interim injunction issued by a Rivers State High Court on January 16, 2026.

The court order explicitly barred the Office of the Chief Judge from receiving or forwarding impeachment-related resolutions, considering any request to form an investigative panel, and acting on any communication from the 27 lawmakers involved in the impeachment process.

​Justice Amadi emphasized that his “hands are legally tied” by these court orders. He noted that as long as the injunctions remain in force, any attempt to proceed with the Assembly’s request would constitute a direct assault on the rule of law and the doctrine of lis pendens (pending litigation).

The Chief Judge emphasized that constitutionalism and the rule of law require all authorities to obey subsisting court orders, irrespective of their perception of the orders’ validity.

He referenced legal precedents, noting that in a similar case in 2007, the Chief Judge of Kwara State was condemned for ignoring a restraining court order when setting up an investigative panel, a decision later voided by the Court of Appeal.

Justice Amadi further observed that the Speaker has already filed an appeal against the court orders at the Court of Appeal, adding another layer to the ongoing legal proceedings surrounding the allegations.

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories