Imo: S’Court Fixes Date To Hear Ihedioha’s Fresh Application

'Dotun Akintomide
Writer

Ad

The Gods Do Change Their Minds, By Funke Egbemode

It was time to install a new king. The process was simple; consult the oracle and let the gods decide. There were two princes contending the throne, Aderopo and Adebiyi. Adebiyi was loved by everybody. He was educated, generous and handsome. He rebuilt the village primary school and every year he bought books and uniforms…

The looming gubernatorial contests in Ekiti, Osun…

By Bola Bolawole [email protected] 0807 552 5533 (Published in the TREASURES column on the back page of the New Telegraph newspaper edition of Wednesday 3 August, 2025). “Last week we postponed discussion on the coming governorship elections in Ekiti and Osun states…” “Yes! Nigeria has become a country of one day, one trouble. If you…

Outrage as presidential aide Daniel Bwala calls Lagos ‘no-man’s land’

By Obinna Uballa The Special Adviser to President Bola Tinubu on Policy Communication, Daniel Bwala, has sparked outrage on social media after describing Lagos State as a “no-man’s land” and the pride of Nigeria’s economy. Bwala made the remarks on Wednesday during an appearance on the Daybreak programme on Arise Television while defending the reported…

Ad

The Supreme Court has fixed Tuesday, February 18 for hearing in the fresh application by erstwhile governor of Imo State, Emeka Ihedioha challenging the judgement earlier delivered on January 14.

A message was circulated on Saturday announcing the hearing date. But one of the lawyers representing Governor Hope Uzodinma, Festus Jombo Esq said although he heard about the new date, the office has not been served the hearing notice.

The Director of Information of the Supreme Court, Dr Akande  confirmed the date for the case.

Ihedioha in the application dated February 5, 2020 and brought through his counsel and former Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Kanu Agabi (SAN) is praying the apex court to set aside the judgement.

Ihedioha and PDP listed five grounds which they said the apex court erred in arriving at its decision to nullify the March 9, 2019 election and declare Uzodinmma winner of the election after he presented excluded results from 388 polling units.

The fresh application is brought under Section 6(6) of the Nigerian Constitution 1999 and Section 22 of the Supreme Court Act, 2004.

A seven-member justices had unanimously ruled that Uzodinma, who is of the APC, proved the allegation of unlawful exclusion of results in 388 polling units of the state where he scored 213,695 votes.

The lead judgment read by Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, held that the Court of Appeal was wrong to have ruled that the PW54, subpoenaed police deputy commissioner, who produced the documents of the results, was not the proper person to tender same as he was not at the polling units.

Ihedioha of the PDP had polled 273,404 votes for the election in 27 local government areas of the state; Action Alliance candidate, Uche Nwosu, polled 190,364 votes and APGA’s Ifeanyi Ararume polled 114,676 votes. With the addition of the excluded votes, Uzodinma’s votes now rose to 310,153.

Ad

X whatsapp