Court dismisses Nnamdi Kanu’s bid for transfer from Sokoto prison

Cat:

Related stories

How Much Gas Prices Have Risen Since the Iran War

Key Takeaways U.S. gas prices have risen about 44%...

Tinubu Orders Forensic Audit of IPPIS, Federal Agencies Over Payroll Fraud

By Nwosa Hamilton President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has directed a...

“I’ve Evidence Tinubu is 90 Years Old, And I’ll Present in Court,” Atiku Claims

By Abiola Olawale Former Vice President and African Democratic Congress...

(VIDEO) Outrage as Nwebonyi Campaigns for Votes Across a River with No Bridge in Ebonyi

https://youtu.be/M70fofT515w?si=914s8kMpIdKaeeO0 By Abiola Olawale A recent campaign outing by Senator Peter...

Oil Prices Head for a Weekly Loss Despite Escalating Iran Tensions

Crude oil prices were on course to book another...

By Obinna Uballa

The Federal High Court in Abuja has struck out an application filed by the convicted leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, seeking his transfer from the Sokoto Correctional Facility.

Justice James Omotosho gave the ruling on Tuesday after Kanu’s counsel, Mr Demdoo Asan of the Legal Aid Council, applied to withdraw from the matter, citing irreconcilable differences with his client.

At the proceedings, Asan told the court that efforts to prosecute the ex-parte motion had been frustrated by the conduct of Kanu and his relatives. He said that although he had maintained constant communication with the applicant’s family since the last adjourned date, they failed to appear at the Legal Aid office to depose to the application, despite repeated assurances.

The lawyer further disclosed that Kanu insisted on dictating how the case should be handled and what counsel should say in open court, a demand he said was incompatible with his duties as an officer of the court.

“He wants to write down what I would say while in court. But, as an officer of the court, I cannot in good faith accept that,” Asan told the judge.

He added that after consulting with his superiors at the Legal Aid Council, they shared his position.

“As officers of the court, when a matter comes to us, we handle it as we see fit. Otherwise, the applicant can seek legal help elsewhere,” he said.

Relying on Order 50, Rule 1 of the Federal High Court Rules, Asan formally applied to withdraw from representing Kanu in the matter.

In his ruling, Justice Omotosho commended the lawyer for what he described as his commitment to the dignity and integrity of the court. He granted leave to Asan and the Legal Aid Council to withdraw from the case.

The judge noted, however, that the ex-parte motion itself was fundamentally flawed. He observed that there was no proof of service on other parties, despite the fact that the matter had last come before the court on December 8, 2025.

While directing that other parties be served in the interest of fairness and justice, Justice Omotosho held that the application was incompetent and could not be entertained.

He consequently ordered that the motion seeking Kanu’s transfer from the Sokoto Correctional Facility be struck out.

The New Diplomat
The New Diplomathttps://newdiplomatng.com/
At The New Diplomat, we stand for ethical journalism, press freedom, accountable Republic, and gender equity. That is why at The New Diplomat, we are committed to speaking truth to power, fostering a robust community of responsible journalism, and using high-quality polls, data, and surveys to engage the public with compelling narratives about political, business, socio-economic, environmental, and situational dynamics in Nigeria, Africa, and globally.

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories