By Sonny Iroche
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming various aspects of life, especially in education and the workplace. The integration of AI tools into educational processes, such as writing and research, shows how much these technologies have become essential. With AI writing assistants like ChatGPT, Grok, Claude, and others, many individuals now work differently and more efficiently. However, this evolution raises questions about the future of traditional educational institutions, the state of critical thinking, academic integrity, and the very nature of work itself. As society approaches the potential of AI singularity and Artificial Super Intelligence , it is crucial to reflect on these changes and their implications for humanity.
AI tools are not just futuristic concepts but are already part of many people’s daily lives. Numerous students have begun using AI to aid in their studies. For example, students often turn to AI writing assistants to help generate ideas, outline essays, or even draft entire papers. In many cases, these tools provide valuable support, making the writing process more efficient. However, some students may also use AI to circumvent academic integrity. By submitting AI-generated content as their own, they might bypass traditional assignment requirements while risking their educational growth. But those that really matter? One might argue. Because, as most work places today have adopted AI, students graduate and seek employment in firms and institutions where AI is the driving force in productivity and efficiency.
Some students who had hitherto struggled with essay writing and research materials Instead of spending hours researching and drafting, turn to AI tools that could generate essays based on prompts. The convenience of using AI could make students reliant on it for assignments. While this approach saves time, some argue that it also deprives people the opportunity to engage deeply with the material and develop critical thinking skills. In this way, AI can inadvertently contribute to a decline in academic rigor. But in competitive world of AI, should humanity place a premium on rigor as opposed to increased productivity and profitability? What is important to the corporate and institutional world of the millennials and GenZees, is the bottom line, and nothing else matters. AI has changed the world more than any other phenomenon, including, the discovery of electricity, the steam engine and the internet.
And in my favorite mantra of “AI or Die”, those individuals, companies and countries that do not adopt AI, will certainly die and go the way of others who change with changing times.
As AI continues to evolve, educational institutions must adapt to the changing landscape. The AA index report highlights the collaboration between human researchers and AI tools in the writing process. This partnership exemplifies how AI can enhance productivity and creativity in academic work. Yet, it also raises the question of how long traditional universities will remain relevant. If students can rely on AI to produce high-quality work, will they need to attend lectures or engage with professors? The increasing reliance on AI could prompt a reevaluation of the role of educators and the purpose of higher education.
In this context, the potential decline in critical thinking skills is alarming. Although some scholars still think that students who increasingly rely on AI for assignments, may find that they lacks the ability to analyze information critically. This lack of engagement with the material could lead to a generation of individuals who struggle to think independently. Society may face significant challenges as a result. The ability to evaluate information, form opinions, and make decisions based on critical analysis is essential for progress and innovation. If students do not cultivate these skills, humanity may find it difficult to cope with complex global challenges. At the rate of AI development, this fear is assuaged.
As AI tools become more sophisticated, the implications for academic integrity also come into play. Plagiarism detection tools, such as Turnitin, are designed to ensure that students submit original work. However, as AI-generated content becomes more advanced, these tools may struggle to differentiate between human-written and AI-generated text. Students may find ways to bypass these detection systems, raising concerns about the authenticity of academic submissions. This situation could lead to a reevaluation of assessment methods in education. Rather than relying solely on written assignments, educators may need to incorporate alternative evaluation methods that prioritize original thought and creativity. As it is now evident, a number of educational institutions are gradually adjusting to the increase use of AI for academic work; by asking the students to declare where AI assistance was utilized.
The inevitable emergence of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and Artificial Super Intelligence (ASI) raises additional questions about the future of work. As AI capabilities expand, many traditional jobs may become obsolete. This shift could lead to a significant transformation in the job market, causing many individuals to wonder whether they will need to work to earn a living. In such a scenario, the concept of Universal Basic Income (UBI), where as a result of exponential growth in world Gross Domestic Product (GDP) people may not need to work anymore, as AI and Agentic AI do all the work. Governments may then have to work out the modalities of salaries and compensation based on a certain formula. If machines can perform most tasks, humans may find themselves with more free time than ever before.
While the idea of endless leisure activities, such as vacations and golfing, sports, hunting and other leisure may sound appealing, it is essential to consider how this lifestyle would impact self-esteem and personal fulfillment. For many, work provides a sense of purpose and identity. The potential for a future without traditional jobs may necessitate a shift in societal values. In line with Darwin’s theory of Natural Selection, those who adapt to the changing landscape may thrive, while others may struggle to find their place in a world dominated by AI.
In conclusion, the integration of AI into education and the workforce raises numerous questions about the future of learning, critical thinking, and work itself. While AI tools can enhance productivity and creativity, they also pose challenges to academic integrity and the relevance of traditional educational institutions. As society approaches the possibilities of AI singularity and superintelligence, it is vital to consider how these changes will affect humanity as a whole. Embracing the opportunities and challenges presented by AI will be essential for shaping a better future, where individuals can thrive in a world that is rapidly transforming.
The future may be uncertain, but reflecting on these questions can provide valuable insights into how to navigate the changing landscape of work and education. The collaboration between humans and AI has the potential to create a richer, more innovative society, but it is crucial to maintain a focus on critical thinking and personal development. By doing so, the future of humanity can be bright, even in an age dominated by artificial intelligence.
NB: Sonny Iroche, is the Chairman of GenAI Learning Concepts Ltd. Lagos.
He was a Senior Academic Fellow, African Studies Centre. University of Oxford. UK 2022-2023.
And currently in Post Graduate Studies in Artificial Intelligence at the Saïd Business School. University of Oxford.
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/sonnyiroche
