Buratai: IPOB Leader Not In Army’s Custody

Hamilton Nwosa
Writer

Ad

Only Death Exposes The Nigerian Looter

By Uzor Maxim Uzoatu The looting going on in Nigeria surpasses whatever the goggled dictator General Sani Abacha was touted to have looted. I guess it was after witnessing the current looting of the day that Abacha’s wife made the claim that General Abacha’s quid saved for Nigeria has been looted! Let it be recalled…

Every Country’s Top Employment Sector

  Key Takeaways In low-income countries, most people work in farming, while in rich countries three-quarters are in services. Industry is no longer the main employer in any country. For comparison, in the 1970s it accounted for 46% of the workforce in the UK. Employment patterns vary greatly depending on a country’s level of development.…

Concerns as Nigeria loses out over South Korea’s $100bn energy deal with the US

By Obinna Uballa Nigeria’s crude oil exports to Asia, a crucial market, is currently facing renewed pressure and uncertainty, experts have warned. According to experts, this development stems from South Korea $100 billion deal agreement with the United States to purchase US energy over the next four years. This has consequently escalated rivalry and competition…

Ad

The Chief of Army Staff, Lt.-Gen. Tukur Buratai, has asked the Federal High Court, Abuja to dismiss a suit, seeking to compel him to produce the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

Kanu’s lawyer, Mr Ifeanyi Ejiofor on Thursday brought an application before the court, praying court to order Buratai to produce Kanu dead or alive.

Ejiofor told court that his client was last seen with the Nigerian Army on Sept. 14 and that neither he (Ejiofor) nor Kanu’s family had seen or heard from Kanu since then. Opposing the motion, however, Buratai through his counsel, Mr Akinlolu Kehinde, told court that Kanu was not and had never been in the custody of the Nigerian Army.

“The Nigerian Army did not at any time arrest or take Kanu into its custody within the period the military operation lasted in the South-East.” The lawyer argued that there was no document before the court to prove that Kanu was in the custody of the army, noting that the onus was on Kanu to prove that he was taken by the army.

Kehinde urged the court to dismiss the application on the ground that it was laden with speculations, conjecture and assumptions which, he said were not admissible in law. A counter-affidavit deposed to by Col. A.A. Yusuf also claimed that the alleged invasion of Kanu’s house during the period of the operation was false. After hearing arguments from both counsel, Justice Binta Nyako adjourned the matter until Dec. 13 to give her ruling.

Ad

X whatsapp