EU Reports Don’t Change Election Outcome, Merely Advisory – Keyamo

Hamilton Nwosa
Writer

Ad

Controversy as BBC Chiefs Resign for Allegedly Doctoring Trump’s Comments

By Abiola Olawale The BBC, one of the world's most prominent public broadcasters, has been rocked by an editorial scandal leading to the resignations of its Director-General, Tim Davie, and its CEO of News, Deborah Turness. The New Diplomat reports that their resignation follows intense pressure over a leaked internal memo alleging the broadcaster's flagship…

Oil Prices Climb as Senate Passes Deal to Reopen Government

In early Asian trade on Monday, crude oil prices were climbing after the United States Senate passed a funding agreement that could end the federal government shutdown. At the time of writing, WTI had climbed to $60.20 while Brent was trading at $64.05, both up by roughly 0.7%. Senate negotiators had struck a deal ahead of a Sunday…

Regina Daniels Vs Ned Nwoko: The Fleeting Illusion of Life

By Fred Chukwuelobe Once upon a time dazzling Regina Daniels and wealthy Senator Ned Nwoko were love birds. They bestrode the world and were the ultimate love birds not withstanding the age difference between them. Some saw the relationship as “child abuse” as Daniels was still a teenager and Nwoko an elder. The two cared…

Ad

Former Minister of State for Labour and Employment in the immediate past adminstration of President Muhammadu Buhari, Festus Keyamo, SAN, on Monday said the final report on Nigeria’s 2023 elections compiled by the European Union, EU, were mere reports of irregularities noticed during the elections and suggested recommendations for better polls in the future.

The Senior Advocate of Nigeria in a post on Twitter, warned that it is not a determinant of the election’s outcome as postulated by Nigerians.

In his words, “Declaring certain aspects of an election or electoral process as ‘flawed’ is not synonymous as saying the whole process was a cataclysmic failure. This is the simple difference a whole bunch of people have failed to realise.

“There is no single election in the entire world that would not record certain complains of irregularities in certain areas. the real issued to determine is whether those supposed irregularities substantially affected the election to the extent that the loser(s) could have won or the winner could have lost. If you cancel an entire process each time some irregularities happen or are reported, we may conduct an election 100 times and no winner would be announced.

“It is only a forensic examination of the entire process by the judiciary that can clearly determine the extent the supposed ‘irregularities’ affected the final outcome of the elections. And there are legal rules already laid down to achieve this. The EU report is NOT (and cannot be) a document that tells you who won or lost an election. It only reports the ‘irregularities’ noticed and makes recommendations for improvement in future elections.

“Therefore, all the hoopla over that EU report is neither here nor there when it comes to legitimising or delegitimising the government of the day. That power or responsibility belongs to the judiciary.

“I hope those who are now gyrating excitedly as if they are ‘speaking in tongues’ over the EU report will also have the spirit and ‘anointing’ to accept and embrace the actual forensic judgment by our properly constituted law courts when they eventually decide on the 2023 elections.”

Ad

X whatsapp