Atiku, Obi Lose Case For Live Transmission of Court Proceedings

The New Diplomat
Writer

Ad

$4.5bn: Court Admits More Evidence Against Emefiele

Justice Rahman Oshodi of the Special Offences Court sitting in Ikeja, Lagos, on October 9,2025, admitted more evidence against a former Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Godwin Emefiele, in an alleged $4.5bn fraud. Emefiele is standing trial on a 19-count charge bordering on receiving gratification and corrupt demand preferred against him by…

NEITI Warns of Deepening Transparency Crisis, Says Nigeria Lost $3.3bn to Oil theft, Sabotage

By Obinna Uballa Nigeria lost an estimated 13.5 million barrels of crude oil valued at $3.3 billion to theft and pipeline sabotage between 2023 and 2024, the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI) has revealed. Executive Secretary of NEITI, Dr. Ogbonnaya Orji, disclosed this on Thursday at the 2025 Association of Energy Correspondents of Nigeria…

Oil Eases over 1.5% after Gaza ceasefire

Summary Israel and Hamas agree to Gaza ceasefire, return of hostages US oil product supplied highest since December 2022, EIA says Stalled peace talks in Ukraine underpin prices Oil prices edged slightly lower on Thursday after Israel and the Palestinian militant group Hamas signed an agreement to cease fire in Gaza. Brent crude futures were…

Ad

By Charles Adingupu

It was a rough day for two presidential candidates, Atiku Abubakar of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, and Peter Obi of the Labour Party, LP, when their application for live broadcast of the sittings of the Presidential Election Petition Court were on Monday 22 May, 2023, dismissed outrightly.

The five-man panel led by Justice Haruna Tsammani dismissed the request as lacking in merit and rejected it.

The five-man panel maintained that countries where cameras are allowed to broadcast such proceedings, have laws that permit the practice.

The court held that allowing cameras in the courtroom is a major judicial policy that must be supported by the law.

The Court also ruled that any attempt to allow cameras will automatically turn the court room into a theatre of a sort.

According to the ruling, no regulatory framework or policy direction permitted it to grant the application.

“The court can only be guided and act in accordance with the practice, directions and procedures approved by the President of the Court of Appeal.

“We cannot permit a situation that may lead to dramatization of our proceedings,” Justice Tsammani said.

Furthermore, the court held that the request was not part of any relief sought by the petitioners and had no bearing on it.

It ruled that the request for a live broadcast will not add to the determination of the petitions adding that the petitioners failed to establish how the live broadcast of the proceedings would advance their case.

Ad

Unlocking Opportunities in the Gulf of Guinea during UNGA80
X whatsapp