N1.64bn Fraud: Court Dismisses Ex-Gov, Nyame’s No-Case Submission

Hamilton Nwosa
Writer

Ad

Controversy as Stanford University Denies Kemi Badenoch’s Scholarship Claim

By Abiola Olawale Kemi Badenoch, the leader of the United Kingdom's Conservative Party, is facing scrutiny over her claim of receiving a pre-med scholarship offer from Stanford University at age 16. This is as Jon Reider, the Stanford admissions officer at the time of Badenoch’s application, disputed the assertion. Badenoch, who was born in London…

2027: “Jonathan Is Legally Qualified to Contest for Presidency”, Brother Speaks Again

By Abiola Olawale Mr Azibaola Robert, an entrepreneur, lawyer and pro-democracy activist has spoken out again, maintaining that his cousin and former President of Nigeria, Goodluck Jonathan is constitutionally and legally qualified to contest for the presidency. Azibaola Robert, a frontline lawyer and former pro-democracy activist, in a press statement posted on his official Facebook…

Gov Sani warns El-Rufai over alleged ‘plot to destabilise Kaduna,’ vows decisive action

By Obinna Uballa The governor of Kaduna State, Uba Sani, has accused his predecessor, ex-Governor Nasir El-Rufai of instigating political unrest and attempting to drag the state into crisis, warning that any attempt to destabilise Kaduna will be met with decisive action. In a statement signed by the Commissioner for Internal Security and Home Affairs,…

Ad

Jolly Nyame, a former governor of Taraba State, has been ordered by a Federal Capital Territory, FCT High Court, Gudu, to begin his defence on March 8, 2017 after Justice Adebukola Banjoko, on February 14, 2017 dismissed his application for a “no-case” submission.

Nyame, who is standing trial for a 41-count charge of criminal misappropriation of N1.64bn state funds, had on January 18, 2017 through his counsel, Charles Edosomwan, SAN, urged the court to “hold that the testimony of prosecution witnesses have been so damaged and can’t be relied on”, and “the crucial elements are missing in this case”.

At the resumed sitting today, the trial judge, citing Sections 302, 303, 357 and 358 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015 noted that, it was in order for a defendant to apply to the court for a “no-case” submission, but the “court shall have discretion whether essential elements of the offence have been proven or not”.

Justice Banjoko, further noted that a prima facie case implies a ground for proceeding, “it doesn’t require proof beyond every reasonable doubt, as is required to find a defendant guilty or not”, and, “whether the prosecution has made some case requiring clarification from the defendant no matter how slight”.

“In relation to this court, having had a close look at the evidence and exhibits, I hold that this case requires him to provide information and give explanation with regards to evidence presented by the prosecution, and so he is ordered to enter into his defence in the interest of justice,” the trial judge held.

Ad

X whatsapp