You Can’t Cage Your Chicago State Varsity Academic Records With Privacy Laws, Atiku Tells Tinubu

The New Diplomat
Writer
Tribunal Postpones Judgment On Atiku’s Petition Against Tinubu

Ad

The World’s $111 Trillion in Government Debt, in One Giant Chart

Key Takeaways Gross public debt stands at $111 trillion globally in 2025, rising by $8.3 trillion since 2024. Together, the U.S. and China hold 51.8% of the world’s government debt. While global public debt is lower than pandemic highs in real terms, it remains stubbornly elevated at $111 trillion. This graphic shows world debt by…

Oil Stabilizes After Selloff Amid OPEC Reassessment and U.S. Funding Deal

Oil prices steadied on Wednesday after a sharp 4% slide the day before, with Brent trading near $63.08 and WTI around $58.80 at 11:01 a.m. ET, as traders reassessed the latest OPEC shift toward a more balanced 2026 market outlook. The passage of the U.S. funding deal that ended the government shutdown removed one macro problem, but crude…

Ad

By Louis Achi

Atiku Abubakar, presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the last presidential election, has told President Bola Tinubu that he cannot hide under the privacy law to stop the release of his academic records from the Chicago State University (CSU).

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Gilbert of Detroit Magistrate court had on September 19, held that Atiku’s application for discovery outweighs Tinubu’s plea for protection under the privacy law.

Tinubu had, amongst other grounds for the denial of Atiku’s request, submitted that Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Gilbert erred in directing the CSU to release documents bordering on his diploma certificate, transcripts and admission letter, amongst others.

But Judge Gilbert pointed out that the case of Atiku has merit as it has to do with Tinubu’s qualification for the 2023 presidential election, which he (Tinubu) won.

Dissatisfied, Tinubu last Thursday begged a Federal High Court presided by Judge Nancy Maldonado to delay the enforcement of the order till Monday, September 25, when he would formally file his objection.

Speaking on Tinubu’s objection, Atiku insisted that all the grounds of objections raised by him against the execution of the lawful order of the magistrate court were resolved by Justice Gilbert after listening to parties.

At Monday’s proceedings, Tinubu had, amongst others, argued that the granting of the order violates his right to privacy and breaches US law regarding the release of academic records.

But Atiku, in his latest move, insisted that the law of privacy pleaded by Tinubu to stop the release of his academic records was not relevant and tenable in this instance.

Atiku’s lawyer, Angela Liu, in her reply, pointed out that the FERPA and analogous state laws do not create an independent privilege for educational records and cannot serve as a shield against a court-issued subpoena.

According to the applicant, “the assertion of a privilege or privacy interest under FERPA is a nonstarter; the statute does not give individuals any enforceable rights”, adding that, “FERPA does not provide a privilege that prevents the disclosure of student records.”

Moreso, Atiku argued that Tinubu cannot plead protection when he “has placed its educational records at issue, ECF 40 at 25-26 (explaining that Intervenor put his diploma at issue by submitting it to INEC and Tinubu’s records have already been introduced into the Nigerian proceedings, including by Tinubu himself, and widely published in the media.

Ad

X whatsapp