Supreme Court Declares Executive Order 10 Unconstitutional

Hamilton Nwosa
Writer
Supreme Court Declares Executive Order 10 Unconstitutional

Ad

AfDB backs AI training to accelerate Agenda 2063 delivery

By Obinna Uballa The African Development Bank (AfDB) has thrown its weight behind a new Artificial Intelligence (AI) training programme aimed at fast-tracking the implementation of Africa’s continental development blueprint, Agenda 2063: The Africa We Want. Through its Joint Secretariat Support Office, the Bank provided technical and financial support for the 5th Annual Training Workshop…

Nigerian Oil Stands to Gain as India Shies Away From Russian Crude

India is pivoting away from Russian oil following U.S. tariff hikes. Indian refiners are moving quickly to secure cargoes from Nigeria, Angola, Abu Dhabi, and the U.S., The shift could deepen ties between India and Nigeria, though competition for Nigerian barrels is rising as the Dangote Refinery ramps toward full capacity and sources more crude…

EU Scrambles to Stay Relevant as Trump-Putin Alaska Summit Looms

The August 15 Trump-Putin meeting has caught Europe off guard, sparking urgent diplomatic moves to avoid being sidelined. EU leaders have set strict red lines on Ukraine, including a cease-fire and security guarantees, but face internal divisions, notably from Hungary. Despite threats of more sanctions and military proposals, Europe’s influence appears limited compared to Washington…

Ad

The Supreme Court has declared as unlawful and unconstitutional the Executive Order 10 (EO10) issued by President Muhammadu Buhari on the funding of State Judiciary and Legislature.

In a split decision on Friday, majority of the court’s seven-member panel agreed that the President exceeded his constitutional powers in issuing the EO10.

The judgment was on the suit filed by the 36 States against the FG on the funding of the Judiciary and the constitutionality of the EO10.

Six out of the seven members of the panel proceeded to void and set aside the EO10.

The majority decision also held that it was not the responsibility of the Federal Government to fund the capital and recurrent expenditures of the courts created for States under Section six of the Constitution.

All the seven members agreed that the States were not entitled to be refunded all they have spent before now to maintain those courts. (NAN)

Ad

X whatsapp