SA court to review corruption charges against Jacob Zuma

Hamilton Nwosa
Writer
new-diplomat default image
new-diplomat default image

Ad

Alibaba shares soar 19% on cloud growth, AI chip development

By Obinna Uballa Alibaba’s Hong Kong-listed shares surged more than 19% on Monday, their highest level since March, following strong quarterly results driven by its cloud computing business and reports of a new AI chip in development, reports said. The rally builds on Friday’s momentum when Alibaba’s U.S.-listed stock jumped nearly 13% after the company…

Wike, others mourn pioneer FCT HoS, Grace Adayilo

By Obinna Uballa The Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, has expressed deep sorrow over the death of Mrs. Grace Adayilo, the pioneer Head of the Civil Service of the FCT and the first woman to perform that role. Some Nigerians have also expressed sadness over her passing on social media. Adayilo…

Why Our Foreign Missions are Facing Financial Crisis, By FG

Says Pragmatic Steps ongoing to address Challenges. By Obinna Uballa The Ministry of Foreign Affiars of Nigeria has that Nigerian embassies and consular offices across the globe are facing severe financial distress, with unpaid staff salaries, mounting debts, and disrupted diplomatic operations exposing deep cracks in the system. In a statement on Monday by Ministry…

Ad

South Africa’s High Court has ruled that a decision to drop 783 corruption charges against President Jacob Zuma should be reviewed, BBC reports.
The charges were dropped just weeks before the 2009 election which led to Mr Zuma becoming president.
Judge Aubrey Ledwaba said the decision by the chief state prosecutor at the time was “irrational”.
The case, brought by the opposition Democratic Alliance, opens the way for prosecutors to reinstate the charges.
Mr Zuma always denied the allegations which are linked to a government arms deal in 1999 worth billions of dollars.

“Today is a great victory for the rule of law and ultimately we believe that Jacob Zuma must face prosecution and this judgement certainly affirms the view that we’ve always held,” Democratic Alliance leader Mmusi Maimane said after the ruling.
“I congratulate my colleagues who’ve worked exceptionally hard on this case; it’s been a long battle.”
It was dubbed the “spy tapes” case after the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) dropped the charges in 2009.
The authority said new phone-tap evidence suggested political interference in the investigation.
South Africa’s governing African National Congress (ANC) said the High Court’s ruling did not infer any culpability in any crime or offence by the president.
“The ANC has consistently supported the legal maxim that justice delayed is justice denied. This matter has dragged on for close to a decade and the ANC is pleased therefore that it now appears closer to resolution, seven years since the NPA decision,” it said in a statement.
This is the latest legal setback for the South African president.
Last month, South Africa’s highest court found that he had breached the constitution by failing to repay public money used to upgrade his private home.
It backed an earlier ruling by an anti-corruption body that said $23m (£15m) of public money had been improperly spent on Mr Zuma’s rural home in Nkandla in KwaZulu-Natal province.

Ad

X whatsapp