Obasa vs Sanwo-Olu: Crisis Deepens As ex-Speaker Drags Assembly To Court, Says He’s Speaker

The New Diplomat
Writer

Ad

DHQ Never Mentioned Any Coup Attempt

1. The attention of the Defence Headquarters (DHQ) has been drawn to a false and misleading report by an online publication insinuating that the cancellation of activities marking Nigeria’s 65th Independence Anniversary was linked to an alleged attempted military coup. The report also made spurious references to the recent DHQ press release announcing the arrest…

Oil Prices Dip as Trump-Putin Summit Looms

Crude oil prices are expected to decline this week due to the hypothetical possibility of a peace agreement between the US and Russia, which could lead to a rebound in Russian oil exports and contribute to a predicted supply glut. The International Energy Agency has revised its demand growth estimates downwards for both this year…

When Forgiveness Is Hard (2), By Funke Egbemode

She was popularly called Mama Iyabo. Her husband threw her out of their matrimonial home 15 years ago, along with her three children, after 15 years of marriage. “I had earlier heard rumours about my husband and another woman. I knew he had girlfriends. He was doing well and living it up, though he took…

Ad

By Abiola Olawale

The last has definitely not been heard about the impeachment of Mudashiru Obasa as the Speaker of the Lagos State House of Assembly.

This is as Obasa has approached the court to challenge his removal as the Speaker of the Lagos State House of Assembly.

The lawsuit was filed on February 12, 2025 before the Lagos State High Court, Ikeja, Obasa, through Obasa’s counsel led by Chief Afolabi Fashanu, SAN.

In the suit, Obasa claimed that his removal and subsequent emergence of a new Speaker, Mojisola Meranda, was illegal.

According to him, the lawmakers were wrong to have removed him when the Assembly was on recess.

Obama, who was out of the country, was removed as the Lagos Assembly speaker on January 13, 2025, by 36 lawmakers.

He challenged his removal upon return to the country, declaring that he remained the speaker.

The embattled lawmaker’s application is predicated on nine grounds, among which is the interpretation of sections 36; 90; 92(2)(c); 101 and 311 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (As amended) vis-à-vis Order V, Rule 18(2) and Order II, Rule 9(1)(ii)(iii)(iv)(v)(vi)(vii)(viii) of Rules and Standing Order of the Lagos State House of Assembly.

Part of the motion reads: “This action challenges the constitutionality of the sitting and proceedings of the Lagos State House of Assembly to sit during recess without the Speaker reconvening the House or giving any other person powers to reconvene the House.

“Public interest requires the case to be heard and determined speedily and expeditiously so that legislative activities in the state are not stalled.

“The legality of the continued sitting of the 1st defendant under the present leadership in violation of the aforementioned laws and rules calls for an urgent determination.

“This Honourable Court is imbued with inherent powers to grant accelerated hearing and abridgement of time.”

Ad

X whatsapp