Barring any last-minute drama, Olumide Akpata is set to be declared as the new President of the Nigerian Bar Association, NBA as he has opened a huge lead in the election where he was the underdog.
If he is declared winner, it will be an upset and the first time in over three decades that the president of the NBA will be emerging from outside the rank of senior advocates.
Read also: US’ Election: No, Trump Can’t Delay The Election, By Ian Millhiser
As at 3.30 pm Thursday, Akpata had polled 8409 votes which are about 53.8 percent of the vote cast.
Babatunde Ajibade, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) had polled 3729 votes while Dele Adesina had 3478 votes.
To get to this stage of the process, the Chief Tawo Tawo-led Electoral Committee of the NBA, had on Wednesday, released a list of 29,635 lawyers who had been accredited to vote in the e-election, scheduled to commence at 11 pm on Wednesday.nba elections
In its “Statement No.18” on Wednesday, the ECNBA said the 29,635 accredited voters excluded “1,604 names with duplicate phone numbers and/or email addresses.”
The electoral committee urged lawyers to conduct themselves “in the respectable manner for which the legal profession is known,” and advised all the candidates in the elections and their supporters to stop campaigning.
The ECNBA said voters could observe the election real-time from the comfort of their locations by following a given link.
Read also: Nigerians With Expired Visas Get Ultimatum To Leave UAE
Meanwhile, in what appears to be the threat of yet another seed of controversy that is presently brewing, a former Chairman of the Nigerian Bar Association, Ikeja branch, Mr. Adesina Ogunlana, has vowed to challenge the verdict of the Lagos State High Court in Ikeja, which affirmed his disqualification from the NBA presidential race, which is being conducted through an electronic poll.
At a press conference in Lagos on Tuesday, Ogunlana explained that he was disqualified by the electoral committee on the basis that he failed to supply a letter of good standing from his local branch.
He blamed the incumbent Chairman of the Ikeja NBA, Mr. Dele Oloke, for not only refusing his application for a letter of good standing but also issuing a May 25, 2020 letter, accusing him of failing to refund N11.65m “withdrawn by you from the branch’s insurance account into your account.”
Ogunlana argued that Oloke had no right to bring up the N11.65m issue as he was already being prosecuted by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and the matter was therefore subjudice.
He maintained that he ought not to have been disqualified from the NBA election because a letter of good standing was not one of the eligibility conditions set out in Section 8(3)(c) of the NBA constitution.
Ogunlana’s attempt to stop the NBA election completely had hit a brick wall last Friday when Justice Adedayo Oyebanji dismissed his application for an interlocutory injunction.
Read also: Drama As Nominees From 3 PDP States Are Absent From Buhari Envoys’ List
The judge said having admitted his failure to submit a letter of good standing to the electoral committee, Ogunlana had no legal right to be protected by the court.
However, Ogunlana said he was displeased with the court’s verdict and would be going on appeal.
He predicted that the NBA elections would be fraught with rigging and end in chaos.
Ogunlana said, “We of the Radical Agenda Movement in the Nigerian Bar Association foresee chaos in the election as the vexatious issue of rigging and manipulation of the electronic voting method adopted by the Nigerian Bar Association with the Constitution of the Nigerian Bar Association (2015 as amended) is rearing its ugly head again.
“Almost all the candidates in the national elections have expressed their doubt with the integrity of the electronic voting platform.
“We categorically demand that to rest this vexatious issue of electronic voting manipulation and rigging, the exercise should be decentralized with the same to be conducted at branch levels before central collation at the national level. We also call for the abolition of the rotational presidency on tribal arrangements as currently exists.”
