Man to Pay N40m Fine for Attempting to Stop Tinubu’s Inauguration

The New Diplomat
Writer
Northern Elders Warn Tinubu, Shettima Against Imposition of Senate President

Ad

Brent Stalls at $65 as Markets Shrug Off OPEC+ Supply Signals

OPEC+ has failed to spark an oil price rally with its commitment to halt production hikes in the first quarter of 2026, as fears of a supply glut continue to weigh on both Brent and WTI. - OPEC+ surprised oil markets by announcing a pause in its scheduled return of voluntary cuts throughout Q1 2026,…

Trump and us, by Hakeem Baba-Ahmed Baba-Ahmed

By Hakeem Baba-Ahmed I admit entertaining some doubt over the authenticity of US President Trump’s first tweet announcing that he had set in motion the process of classifying Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern, again. The bit that confused me was the reference to Nigerian Christians as ‘our Christians’. The world is now familiar…

Tension as U.S. lawmaker Riley Moore rebukes China, backs Trump’s warning to Nigeria

By Obinna Uballa A United States lawmaker, Rep. Riley M. Moore, has thrown his weight behind President Donald Trump’s warning to intervene militarily in Nigeria if the alleged persecution of Christians continues, insisting that the U.S. will not allow China to influence its foreign policy decisions. Moore, in a statement on Tuesday amid growing concern…

Ad

By Charles Adingupu 

For attempting to halt the May 29 inauguration of the President-elect, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, a former presidential candidate, Chief Ambrose Albert Owuru has been fined a whooping N40 million.

The Court of Appeal in Abuja on Thursday imposed the fine on Chief Albert Owuru for filing a frivolous petition aimed at Scuttling the Swearing in ceremony.

The appellate court in its ruling, ordered the politician to pay the fine of N10 million each to President Muhammadu Buhari, Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), and Bola Tinubu who were the 1st to 4th defendants in his case.

Justice Jamil Tukur, who read the lead judgment of the three-man panel of the court, held that Owuru embarked on a gross abuse of court process by filing a frivolous, vexatious and irritating suit to provoke the respondents.

The Court of Appeal held that the grievances of Owuru against the 2019 presidential election were not only strange but uncalled for because these grievances had been pursued up to Supreme Court and dismissed for want of merit.

Justice Tukur said that the action of Owuru in resuscitating a case that died since 2019 at the Supreme Court was calculated to make the lower courts go on collision course with the supreme apex court.

Ad

Unlocking Opportunities in the Gulf of Guinea during UNGA80
X whatsapp