Just In: Why Court Again Adjourned Sowore, Bakare Trial

'Dotun Akintomide
Writer

Ad

FEDA invests $75m in Spiro to accelerate Africa’s electric mobility transition

By Obinna Uballa The Fund for Export Development in Africa (FEDA), the development equity investment arm of African Export-Import Bank (Afreximbank), has announced a $75 million strategic investment in Spiro, Africa’s leading electric two-wheel assembler and operator of the continent’s fastest-growing battery swapping network, according to a statement made available to The New Diplomat by…

EFCC Declares Ex-Gov. Timipre Sylva Wanted Over Alleged $14.8M Fraud

By Abiola Olawale ​The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has declared Chief Timipre Sylva, a former Minister of State for Petroleum Resources and former Governor of Bayelsa State, wanted over an alleged connection with a case of conspiracy and dishonest conversion involving over $14.8 million in public funds. ​This declaration was made public via…

Ex-French president Sarkozy freed from jail after 20 days

By Obinna Uballa Former French President Nicolas Sarkozy has been released from prison pending the outcome of his appeal against a conviction for allegedly receiving illegal campaign funding from Libya. A court in Paris ordered his release on Monday after prosecutors supported his application, ending a 20-day jail stint he described as a “nightmare.” Sarkozy,…

Ad

The trial of the Convener of #RevolutionNow movement, Omoyele Sowore and co-defendant Olawale Bakare has been adjourned till 1 April 2020.

Justice Ijeoma Ojukwu of the Federal High Court, Abuja, gave the new date following the failure of the prosecution to serve the defendants the witness statements.

Mr. Femi Falana, lead counsel to Sowore and Bakare, raised an objection when the first prosecution witness, Rasheed Olawale, was giving evidence out of the summary statement.

Falana urged the court to limit and restrict the witness to the summary of the statement that was made available to them by the prosecution.

He argued that the evidence being given by the witness was mischievous and alien to section 36 of the constitution that guarantees fair hearing.

In his own submission, prosecution counsel, A.A Aliyu, asked the court to dismiss Falana’s objection on the grounds that the evidence given by the witness would not amount to miscarriage of justice as painted by the defence.

The trial judge therefore asked the prosecution to reproduce the witness statement in details to accommodate whatever evidence the witness want to give whenever it was called upon.

The judge said, “Serve them these evidence, I don’t know what is difficult in that. Serve them all the evidence you want to rely on.

“That should not be difficult and that is the provision of the law.”

Ad

X whatsapp