Just In: Why Court Again Adjourned Sowore, Bakare Trial

'Dotun Akintomide
Writer

Ad

AfDB backs AI training to accelerate Agenda 2063 delivery

By Obinna Uballa The African Development Bank (AfDB) has thrown its weight behind a new Artificial Intelligence (AI) training programme aimed at fast-tracking the implementation of Africa’s continental development blueprint, Agenda 2063: The Africa We Want. Through its Joint Secretariat Support Office, the Bank provided technical and financial support for the 5th Annual Training Workshop…

Nigerian Oil Stands to Gain as India Shies Away From Russian Crude

India is pivoting away from Russian oil following U.S. tariff hikes. Indian refiners are moving quickly to secure cargoes from Nigeria, Angola, Abu Dhabi, and the U.S., The shift could deepen ties between India and Nigeria, though competition for Nigerian barrels is rising as the Dangote Refinery ramps toward full capacity and sources more crude…

EU Scrambles to Stay Relevant as Trump-Putin Alaska Summit Looms

The August 15 Trump-Putin meeting has caught Europe off guard, sparking urgent diplomatic moves to avoid being sidelined. EU leaders have set strict red lines on Ukraine, including a cease-fire and security guarantees, but face internal divisions, notably from Hungary. Despite threats of more sanctions and military proposals, Europe’s influence appears limited compared to Washington…

Ad

The trial of the Convener of #RevolutionNow movement, Omoyele Sowore and co-defendant Olawale Bakare has been adjourned till 1 April 2020.

Justice Ijeoma Ojukwu of the Federal High Court, Abuja, gave the new date following the failure of the prosecution to serve the defendants the witness statements.

Mr. Femi Falana, lead counsel to Sowore and Bakare, raised an objection when the first prosecution witness, Rasheed Olawale, was giving evidence out of the summary statement.

Falana urged the court to limit and restrict the witness to the summary of the statement that was made available to them by the prosecution.

He argued that the evidence being given by the witness was mischievous and alien to section 36 of the constitution that guarantees fair hearing.

In his own submission, prosecution counsel, A.A Aliyu, asked the court to dismiss Falana’s objection on the grounds that the evidence given by the witness would not amount to miscarriage of justice as painted by the defence.

The trial judge therefore asked the prosecution to reproduce the witness statement in details to accommodate whatever evidence the witness want to give whenever it was called upon.

The judge said, “Serve them these evidence, I don’t know what is difficult in that. Serve them all the evidence you want to rely on.

“That should not be difficult and that is the provision of the law.”

Ad

X whatsapp