Inside Details Of Why Appeal Court Dismissed Shaibu’s Plea, Upheld Ighodalo’s Candidacy

The New Diplomat
Writer

Ad

OPEC Rejects Media Reports of Major Output Hike Ahead of G8 Meet

OPEC has slammed the brake on speculation, flatly rejecting media reports that the G8 is preparing to hike crude oil production by half a million barrels per day. In a statement from Vienna on Tuesday, the OPEC Secretariat called the claims “wholly inaccurate and misleading,” stressing that discussions among ministers for the upcoming meeting haven’t…

Ranked: Countries Losing the Most (and Least) from Trump’s Tariffs

Trump’s tariffs are hitting all of America’s major trading partners. But in U.S. trade, what matters isn’t just the tariffs a country faces—it’s how they stack up against competitors. This visualization, made with the Hinrich Foundation, shows which countries are losing the most, and the least, from Trump’s tariffs. The data seen here is sourced from…

Emergency in Rivers: Romancing impunity?, By Ebun Olu-Adegboruwa 

By Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, SAN “I urge every Nigerian home and abroad to try and live within the confines of the law of the land and the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. If we are able to do just that, we will be sure of ensuring that peace and unity reign in the country.…

Ad

By Abiola Olawale

The Court of Appeal sitting in Abuja on Monday struck out a lawsuit filed before it by the former Deputy Governor of Edo State, Philip Shaibu, seeking the nullification of the candidacy of the Edo state governorship candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Asue Ighodalo.

The appellate court also upheld the candidacy of Ighodalo as the duly nominated and authentic candidate of the PDP for the September 21 governorship election in Edo State.

In the ruling on Monday, Justice, A. M Lamido-led three-man panel held that Shaibu’s suit was premature, noting that the position of the lower court was unassailable.

Justice Lamido who read out the ruling said the lower court corrected and issued a judgment that Shaibu did not satisfy the condition precedent (internal dispute resolution mechanism) before instituting the action and therefore declared that the suit was premature.

The court also awarded a cost of 1,000,000 against Shaibu and in favour of Ighodalo, the Independent National Electoral Commission, and two others.

He ruled: “No evidence from the affidavit of the appellant to show votes were allocated to the 4th respondent. The appellant failed to prove his case as held by the trial court. The issue is resolved against the appellant and in favour of the respondents.

“Judgment of trial court is hereby affirmed. A cost of 1,000,000 is awarded against the appellant and in favour of the respective respondents.”

According to the ruling, the appellant failed to comply with provisions of Article 9 (g) (h) (i). NYAME V. INEC that condition precedent must be complied with before filing an action.

The court noted that failure to comply with the provision of Article 9 (g), (h), and (i) cannot just be glossed over as it goes to the issue of jurisdiction.

Ad

Unlocking Opportunities in the Gulf of Guinea during UNGA80
X whatsapp