A’Ibom APC Gov. Dispute: Court Rules In Ita Enang’s Favour

Hamilton Nwosa
Writer

Ad

OPEC Rejects Media Reports of Major Output Hike Ahead of G8 Meet

OPEC has slammed the brake on speculation, flatly rejecting media reports that the G8 is preparing to hike crude oil production by half a million barrels per day. In a statement from Vienna on Tuesday, the OPEC Secretariat called the claims “wholly inaccurate and misleading,” stressing that discussions among ministers for the upcoming meeting haven’t…

Ranked: Countries Losing the Most (and Least) from Trump’s Tariffs

Trump’s tariffs are hitting all of America’s major trading partners. But in U.S. trade, what matters isn’t just the tariffs a country faces—it’s how they stack up against competitors. This visualization, made with the Hinrich Foundation, shows which countries are losing the most, and the least, from Trump’s tariffs. The data seen here is sourced from…

Emergency in Rivers: Romancing impunity?, By Ebun Olu-Adegboruwa 

By Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, SAN “I urge every Nigerian home and abroad to try and live within the confines of the law of the land and the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. If we are able to do just that, we will be sure of ensuring that peace and unity reign in the country.…

Ad

The Federal High Court sitting in Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, today ruled that all processes filed by Senator Ita Enang in his case challenging the purported emergence of Mr Akanimo Udofia as the governorship candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Akwa Ibom State are valid and were done in accordance with the rules of the court and extant laws.

Counsel to Akanimo Udofia and the APC had asked the court to set aside a motion for amendment by the plaintiff’s counsel, expressing concern that bringing in additional documents to the matter would end up confusing the court and delay the processes.

The defendants also argued that the originating summons filed in Uyo but served on the defendants in Abuja should have been endorsed to indicate that it was served outside where the court is domiciled.

Delivering ruling on the plea challenging plaintiff’s request for amendment, the court granted the plaintiff’s application and ordered that the defendants be served with and reply to the amended processes within 5 days. The court also gave the plaintiff 2 days to reply to the defendant’s counter affidavit.

The court however deferred ruling on whether jurisdiction of filing the summons till final judgement.

The case was adjourned to September 1st, 2022.

Ad

Unlocking Opportunities in the Gulf of Guinea during UNGA80
X whatsapp