A’Ibom APC Gov. Dispute: Court Rules In Ita Enang’s Favour

Hamilton Nwosa
Writer

Ad

Details as DR Congo Dumps Nigeria Out of World Cup Qualification Race

By Abiola Olawale The Super Eagles of Nigeria have been eliminated from the race to qualify for the 2026 World Cup in the United States. This is as DR Congo defeated the Super Eagles at the CAF World Cup final on Sunday. DR Congo has now proceeded to the intercontinental playoff following a dramatic penalty…

Lieutenant Yerima escapes assassination attempt in Abuja

A young Nigerian Navy officer, Lt. A.M. Yerima, who recently had a confrontation with the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, reportedly escaped an assassination attempt on Sunday evening. Military sources told Vanguard that Yerima was trailed by unidentified men dressed in black and riding in two unmarked Hilux vans with no number…

When Character Leaves Its Footprint, by Johnson Babalola

By Johnson Babalola Over the years, in both my personal and professional journeys, I have encountered people of many different characters. Some have amused me, others have shocked or surprised me. A few have inspired and encouraged me, while others have left me deeply troubled. Some crossed my path only briefly, yet their impact—positive or…

Ad

The Federal High Court sitting in Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, today ruled that all processes filed by Senator Ita Enang in his case challenging the purported emergence of Mr Akanimo Udofia as the governorship candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Akwa Ibom State are valid and were done in accordance with the rules of the court and extant laws.

Counsel to Akanimo Udofia and the APC had asked the court to set aside a motion for amendment by the plaintiff’s counsel, expressing concern that bringing in additional documents to the matter would end up confusing the court and delay the processes.

The defendants also argued that the originating summons filed in Uyo but served on the defendants in Abuja should have been endorsed to indicate that it was served outside where the court is domiciled.

Delivering ruling on the plea challenging plaintiff’s request for amendment, the court granted the plaintiff’s application and ordered that the defendants be served with and reply to the amended processes within 5 days. The court also gave the plaintiff 2 days to reply to the defendant’s counter affidavit.

The court however deferred ruling on whether jurisdiction of filing the summons till final judgement.

The case was adjourned to September 1st, 2022.

Ad

X whatsapp