Court Can Still Sack Tinubu After May 29 Swearing in – Atiku

The New Diplomat
Writer
Tribunal Postpones Judgment On Atiku’s Petition Against Tinubu

Ad

Israel, Hamas Greenlight First Phase of Trump’s Peace Plan

By Abiola Olawale Israel and Hamas have inked their approval on the inaugural phase of the United States President Donald Trump's Gaza peace initiative. The agreement, announced on Wednesday amid high-stakes indirect talks in Egypt, paves the way for an immediate ceasefire, the release of hostages, and a surge in humanitarian aid. This development is…

Where Extreme Poverty Rates Are Highest in the World

Key Takeaways Africa is home to 23 of the top 30 countries with the highest rates of extreme poverty. Kosovo ranks in 19th globally in 2024, seeing the highest rates outside of Africa—a country that faces high unemployment rates and ongoing conflict. The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) produces roughly three-quarters of the world’s cobalt, it…

Oil Prices Drop as Israel and Hamas Agree to Ceasefire

Oil prices fell in early morning trade on Thursday in Asia as Israel and Hamas agreed to a pause in fighting and a hostages-for-prisoners exchange, under a framework advanced by the Trump administration. Under the agreement, Hamas will release as many as 20 living hostages this weekend, and Israel will pull back forces to a negotiated…

Ad

By Yemi Yusuf

The Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, candidate in the 2023 Presidential Election, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, on Tuesday explained why he was not worried that President-elect, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu, would be sworn in on May 29, before the conclusion of petitions seeking to nullify his victory.

“I have been asked about May 29, I want to assure people that swearing-in is only a ceremony that does not in any way tie the hands of the court. The taking of oath binds the person who takes the oath and not the court,” he said.

Atiku, who is currently challenging the declaration of Tinubu as winner of the presidential election that held on February 25, said he was hopeful that he would reclaim his mandate in court.

Speaking through his lead counsel, Chief Chris Uche, SAN, shortly after the Presidential Election Petition Court, PEPC, sitting in Abuja, consolidated his petition with those filed by candidate of the Labour Party, Mr. Peter Obi and the Allied Peoples Movement, APM, Atiku, maintained that the court, has the powers to sack Tinubu from office, even after the swearing in ceremony
Noting that full blown hearing on the three merged petitions would commence on May 30, a day after Tinubu’s swearing in as President, the PDP candidate, through his team of lawyers also spoke about the merger of petitions.

“The court has given you its timelines for parties to present their case. We are happy that with the development, the petitions will be expeditiously determined, ” Uche, SAN, added.

It will be recalled that the Justice Haruna Tsammani-led five-member panel had during the presentation of its pre-hearing report on Tuesday, okayed Atiku’s request to use three weeks to present evidence before the court, through 100 witnesses.

Atiku had in his joint petition with the PDP, marked: CA/PEPC/05/2023, maintained that the declaration of Tinubu as winner of the presidential election was “invalid by reason of non- compliance with the provisions of the Electoral Act, 2022”.
He also argued that Tinubu’s election was invalid by reason of corrupt practices.

Aside from praying the court to declare him winner of the presidential election, having secured the second highest number of votes cast, Atiku and the PDP, applied for the withdrawal of the Certificate of Return that was earlier issued to Tinubu by the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC.

Meanwhile, the President-elect has barred his legal team from speaking to newsmen throughout the duration of the court proceedings.

The lead counsel for the APC at the resumed proceedings on Tuesday, Chief Niyi Akintola, SAN, revealed this in open court after the panel hinted it may ban both lawyers and members of the public from entering the courtroom with their mobile phones and other electronic gadgets.
Justice Tsammani said the decision was based on the need to enhance security within the courtroom and to protect the sanctity of the proceedings.

Responding, Chief Akintola, SAN, said: “My lords, that is why those of us that are representing the 2nd and 3rd respondents (Tinubu and APC), are acting on strict instructions.

“We have taken a decision not to talk to the press. We have 38 SANs in our team and my lords, in fact, the penalty for anyone that goes against the instruction and speaks to the press after every proceeding, is expulsion from the team,” he added.

 

Ad

Unlocking Opportunities in the Gulf of Guinea during UNGA80
X whatsapp