Breaking: Presidential Tribunal Strikes Out INEC’s Objection To Atiku’s Petition

'Dotun Akintomide
Writer
new-diplomat default image
new-diplomat default image

Ad

Court fixes November 20 for judgment in Nnamdi Kanu’s terrorism trial

By Obinna Uballa The Federal High Court in Abuja has fixed November 20 for judgment in the terrorism case against detained Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) leader, Nnamdi Kanu. Justice James Omotosho announced the date on Friday after Kanu failed to open his defence, despite being given six days to present his case. The judge…

Court Awarded Me N52m Over Attack On My Home --- Kanu’s Lawyer

Nigeria loses in Race for DG of Weapons Prohibition Organization

• Switzerland's Amb Matter wins as DG by Consensus By Abiola Olawale Nigeria's bid to secure the seat of Director-General (DG) of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) has officially failed. This is as Nigeria's candidate, Ambassador Eniola Ajayi, has lost out of the race for the position of Director-General of the…

Nnamdi Kanu complies with court directive, begins defence in terrorism trial

By Obinna Uballa Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), has formally begun the process of defending the terrorism charges filed against him by the Federal Government, in line with a directive of the Federal High Court in Abuja. According to Daily Post, an online medium, Kanu is currently submitting his defence…

Ad

In its first ruling, the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal sitting in Abuja has dismissed preliminary objection the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, filed to challenge the non-inclusion of Vice President Yemi Osibanjo, SAN, as a party to the petition challenging the outcome of the February 23 presidential election.

In a unanimous decision, the tribunal held that the objection was not grounded in law.

INEC had in the motion it filed on May 5, asked the tribunal to strike out the petition over failure to join the Vice President, Prof. Yemi Osibanjo as a necessary party in the case.

It argued that by section 133 and 137(2) of the Electoral Act, Prof. Osibanjo, was a co-winner of the presidential election and therefore an indispensable party whose right to the fair hearing would be adversely affected.

INEC contended that failure to join Osibanjo as an interested party in the petition robbed the tribunal of its jurisdiction to entertain the petition.

However, the tribunal, in the lead ruling that was delivered by its Chairman, Justice Mohammed Garba, dismissed INEC’s objection as lacking in merit.

More details to come….

Ad

Unlocking Opportunities in the Gulf of Guinea during UNGA80
X whatsapp