Breaking: Chicago State University Provided Conflicting Letters On Tinubu’s Certificate – Supreme Court

The New Diplomat
Writer

Ad

BREAKING! [VIDEO] Ministers, Advisors, Party Chief, military officers killed in Helicopter Crash in Ghana

By Abiola Olawale A devastating military helicopter crash in Ghana’s Adansi Akrofuom District has claimed the lives of eight individuals, including two prominent ministers, advisors, and military personnel. The incident, which occurred on Wednesday, August 6, 2025, has been described as a "Black Wednesday" for Ghana, with the government and citizens grappling with the profound…

South-South Highways Now Dead traps, Says King of Idjerhe

By Abiola Olawale In a passionate plea, His Royal Majesty, King Obukowho Monday Arthur Whiskey, the Ovie of Idjerhe Kingdom, has spoken up about what he called the deteriorating state of roads in Nigeria’s South-South region, labeling them "death traps" that have left communities isolated and lives at risk. The monarch also urged both the…

Murdoch to provide health updates to Trump in deal to delay Epstein case deposition

Rupert Murdoch will give President Donald Trump updates on his health to postpone his deposition in Trump’s defamation lawsuit over a Wall Street Journal article about Jeffrey Epstein. The agreement comes after Trump’s lawyers sought a quick deposition from Murdoch, implying he could be dead or too sick to testify in person by the time…

Ad

By Louis Achi

Nigeria’s Supreme Court has said there are conflicting letters from the Chicago State University (CSU) on President Bola Tinubu’s certificate.

Chairman of the 7-member panel, Justice John Okoro, hearing the application of Atiku Abubakar, Presidential Candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), filed against the victory of President Bola Tinubu, said this, Monday.

It could be recalled that Nigeria’s electoral umpire the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) had declared President Tinubu of the All Progressives Congress (APC) winner of the February election, but his opponents challenged this verdict in court.

The Presidential Election Petition Tribunal, PEPT, had struck out the appeals of Atiku and Labour Party’s Peter Obi, but they headed for the apex court, with Atiku asking to file extra evidence against Tinubu on the alleged certificate forgery.

The PDP presidential candidate had sought Tinubu’s academic record from Chicago State University so as to prove his allegation that the president submitted forged documents to INEC.

However, by the time the documents were released the 180 days statutory period within which an election petition should be filed and determined had elapsed.

Nevertheless, Atiku asked the court to grant his appeal to tender fresh evidence, given the nature of the issue. Tinubu kicked against this, saying granting such would amount to abuse of court process.

But Atiku predicated his plea on the grounds that presenting forged documents by any candidate, especially by one for the highest office in the land, is a grave constitutional issue that must not be encouraged.

Not yielding any ground, Tinubu is arguing that the issue is a pre-election matter amongst others and subsequently prayed the court to deny the grant of the application.

Faulting Tinubu’s argument, Atiku submitted that issues of merit ought not to be determined or pronounced upon at the interlocutory stage.

He also held that the presentation of a forged certificate disqualifies a candidate for all time, notwithstanding when presented.

Speaking at the hearing on Monday, Justice Okoro said criminal matters have to be proved beyond reasonable doubt.

His words: “But in this case, there are two conflicting letters from the CSU – one authenticating the president’s certificate and another discrediting it. Which do we rely on?”

Ad

X whatsapp