The prospects for independent candidacy in Nigeria became a forlorn hope, Wednesday, after a suit challenging Nigerian laws barring it was dismissed by the ECOWAS Court of Justice.
Notwithstanding the numerous political parties in the country, Nigerians often result to making the hard choice between two dominant parties — the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) formed at Nigeria’s return to civil rule in 1999 and later, the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) birthed in 2014. But for years, a lot Nigerians had argued that the dominant parties don’t usually throw up the right candidates with merit and service-driven vision to stand for elections.
Read also: ECOWAS Court Orders Nigerian Govt To Pay 244 Soldiers Dismissed In 2016
Many atimes, it is a given that parties’ torch in elections will go to the highest bidder, making the case to be of high interest to Nigerians drumming support for independent candidacy in Africa’s largest democracy.
The case brought before the court in November 2018 by Obinna Umeh, Kenneth Roberts, Dr. Matthew Oguche and Emmanuel Agada, asked the court to compel Nigeria to allow independent candidates to contest in general elections.
Read also: ECOWAS Throws Weight Behind Okonjo-Iweala For WTO DG
They argued that the mandatory membership of political parties stated in the constitution as pre-requisite to contest elections infringes on their right to vote and be voted for.
The plaintiffs further argued that the membership of political parties infringes on their human rights as enshrined in the African Charter and Universal Declaration on Human Rights, International Covenants on Civil and Political Rights to which Nigeria is a signatory.
Read also: ECOWAS Appoints Buhari Coordinator Of Covid-19 Response In Region
However, Nigeria in its defence said that the ECOWAS Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the suit which has direct bearing on its constitution.
In its ruling, a three-member panel of justices presided over by the court’s President, Justice Edward Asante, held that Nigeria did not breach any convention or charter.
Read also: Buhari Speaks On How ECOWAS Should Spend Anti-Terrorism Fund
The ECOWAS court said that it had examined all treaties and protocols that Nigeria is signatory to and it is clear the country has not erred.
“I looked at the international laws which are very clearly stated that the rights to vote and to be voted for are all rights enshrined in all the enactments, protocols, declarations and conventions as alluded to by counsel for the plaintiff.
“But, all those rights are subject to a rider and the rider is subject to law. Subject to law means subject to laws made within the country. In our view, the Nigerian constitution as well as the enactment on election complies fully with the international obligations to conduct elections.
“The rider here is that they should belong to political parties,’’ Asante said.
The presiding judge also said that it is only a matter of common sense that giving the population and diversity of Nigeria, allowing for independent candidacy will be almost impossible to handle.
“Law also in a way goes with common sense. It is clear that a country with a population of over 200 million, if in an election, 400 people decide to contest the presidency, you are going to have a ballot paper of over 50 pages.
“That is why the constitution of Nigeria as well as the electoral laws thought it wise to make people belong to such groups.
Therefore, we think that there is nothing wrong with Nigeria, putting within their laws that parties should belong to grouping before they can contest elections. It has not infringed in any way in our view on their rights to contest election,” he said.
On jurisdiction to hear the matter as argued by the legal representatives of the federal government, the sub-regional court held that it has the jurisdiction to hear the matter.
“We adjudge that we have jurisdiction to hear the matter; the action is admissible, though on the merits we dismiss the entire action as unmeritorious. That is the decision of the court,” he said.
