Appeal Court Dismisse Olakehinde, Kantigi Accomplice’s Right Enforcement Suit Against EFCC

Hamilton Nwosa
Writer

Ad

Global CEOs, Top Diplomats, Ministers, Governors, Industry leaders gather in New York to unlock the Gulf of Guinea’s over $800 billion Energy, Oil & Gas, Minerals, Maritime Opportunities

By Abiola Olawale Following the official opening of the 80th Session of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA80), New York, USA, high-level delegations from over a dozen countries, including global CEOs, top diplomats, ministers, governors, industry leaders will gather in New York to unlock the Gulf of Guinea’s over $800 billion Energy, Oil & Gas,…

Charted: Populations of China, India, U.S., and Europe (1950–2100)

Key Takeaways India is projected to remain the world’s most populous country through 2100, stabilizing around 1.5 billion people. China’s population is expected to fall by more than half, from 1.4 billion to 0.6 billion. Europe’s population will decline steadily, while the U.S. population grows gradually to 420 million. As global demographics continue to shift,…

Elon Musk drops to second place as AI boom powers Oracle’s Larry Ellison to world’s richest status

By Obinna Uballa Elon Musk has lost his long-held crown as the world’s richest person to Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, following a record-breaking surge in Ellison’s net worth. According to Bloomberg’s Billionaire Index, Ellison’s fortune jumped by an unprecedented $101 billion on Tuesday night to reach $393 billion, surpassing Musk’s $385 billion. The windfall came…

Ad

The Court of Appeal, Abuja Judicial Division, has dismissed a fundamental human right enforcement procedure act brought against the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, by a purported importer of cars, Olalekan Olakehinde, seeking N500 million in damages, after the EFCC seized 17 vehicles believed to be proceeds of illicit activities.
The said vehicles were traced to Liman Kantigi, a former Commissioner for Local Government in Niger State, who is also a former governorship aspirant. They were suspected to be illegally acquired. About N6 billion was also traced to him, which he could not account for. While Kantigi is yet to honour the invitation of the EFCC, the anti-graft agency secured an interim forfeiture order of the account where the money is domiciled. The order remains valid as it has not been vacated.
Like Kantigi, Olakehinde has also wilfully refused to honour invitations by the EFCC, but instead instituted the fundamental human right enforcement procedure action against the EFCC. Investigations had revealed that, in spite of his claim to being the Chairman of AY Emirate Motors Limited, he was in fact, a front for Kantigi.
Olakehinde had through his counsel, Aliyu Umar, SAN, approached the court, with a 23 paragraph affidavit, dated June 13, 2017 seeking for seven prayers. Specifically, he urged the court to “award damages against the EFCC in the sum of N500 million”, and asked for “an order or perpetual injunction” against the EFCC.
Aliyu Bokani, counsel for the EFCC, filed a 227 paragraph counter-affidavit in opposition to the applicant’s motion on notice, arguing that Olakehinde benefited from illegal activities and suspicious transactions, running into millions of naira, which prompted an investigation of his business dealings.
“The said AY Emirate Motors Limited was registered in 2015, while the illicit transfer of over N80 million from a company linked to Kantigi was carried out in 2014 into Olakehinde’s personal account and not that of AY Emirate Motors,” Bokani said.
He further explained that: “Investigations revealed that the said money were transferred before the incorporation of AY Emirate Motors Limited.”
Justice Halilu Yusuf, a vacation judge, who presided over the matter, in his judgement, of September 8, 2017 dismissed the suit in its entirety noting that “Olakehinde instituted the suit so that he will not honour the invitation.”
Dissatisfied, Olakehinde proceeded to the court of appeal seeking among other things “an order of perpetual injunction restraining the respondent from searching and/or carting away the applicant’s personal property without due process of law stipulated by the constitution and other enabling statutes.
The appellant also sought an order of the court to to the effect that he was entitled to own personal property and conduct his legitimate business across the length and breadth of Nigeria under the provisions of the 1999 constitution (as amended).
In response, Bokani distilled a lone issue for determination asking the appellate court to determine “Whether the trial court was wrong in arriving at the decision being appealed against”.
In his brief of argument, the EFCC counsel contended that, “There is no right of applicant known to law breached here worthy of any judicial injunction by way of order”.
He urged the court to dismiss the appeal and avoid being used in clipping the wings of the EFCC unnecessarily.
In its well considered judgment, a panel of three justices of the Court of Appeal led by Justice Ahmad O. Belgore on December 7, 2017 held that “the appellant did not establish and has not proven any case of contravention of his fundamental human right before the lower court”.
“There is no merit in this appeal, and it is hereby dismissed”, the court ruled.

Ad

Unlocking Opportunities in the Gulf of Guinea during UNGA80
X whatsapp