APC, PDP leaders Kick as Canada’s Court frames Parties as terrorist bodies

Abiola Olawale
Writer
Tension As APC, PDP Hold Governorship Primaries

Ad

Why Wike Should Resign or Be Sacked: A Call to Organized Civil Society in Nigeria to Uphold Anti-corruption Standards with Consistency, By Frank Tietie

By Frank Tietie The revelations by Nigerian social crusader, investigative journalist, and activist Omoyele Sowore regarding the current Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyiesome Wike, are serious and warrant the attention of all Nigerians who care about the integrity of the country. Sowore has alleged that Wike laundered funds and concealed the purchase of…

Dangote Refinery Slams PENGASSAN, Describes Order as ‘Economic Sabotage’

By Abiola Olawale In an escalating labor showdown, the Dangote Petroleum Refinery has fired back at the Petroleum and Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria (PENGASSAN), criticising the latter’s order on Saturday. This is as the refinery owned by Africa’s richest person, Alhaji Aliko Dangote described PENGASSAN's order to cut crude oil and gas…

Intimate Affairs: ‘I don’t want a mother-in-law,’ By Funke Egbemode

By Funke Egbemode Tola doesn’t wish anybody dead. She just doesn’t want to go through what her mother went through in the hands of her grandmother. She had been told that she might just be lucky and end up with a husband with a kind mother. But she’s scared, I believe, irredeemably, by the trauma…

Ad

By Obinna Uballa

The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the All Progressives Congress (APC), have firmly rejected a ruling by a Canadian federal court classifying both as terrorist organisations.

APC National Secretary, Senator Ajibola Bashiru, in his reaction, dismissed the ruling as “baseless,” insisting that the Canadian court has no jurisdiction over the status of a Nigerian-recognised political party.

“The so-called judgment was delivered from a jaundiced perspective and within the narrow confines of determining eligibility for asylum,” Bashiru told the media.

He added: “It is unfortunate that some unpatriotic Nigerians will allow the country’s name to be dragged into unpalatable commentary by racist judges on account of self-contrived asylum claims.”

Also reacting, PDP Deputy National Youth Leader, Timothy Osadolor, described the classification as “misinformed, biased, and lacking evidence.”

“There’s nothing to show that even the malfunctioning APC is a terrorist organisation, let alone the PDP, which is a credible institution,” Osadolor reportedly said.

“If they wanted to say that some individuals in the APC government have traces to terrorism, they may have a case. But labelling an entire political party is wrong,” he added.

Both parties have urged Canadian authorities to focus on individual accountability rather than sweeping classifications that, in their view, distort Nigeria’s democratic image and threaten international relations.

Recall that on June 17, 2025 Justice Phuong Ngo of a Canadian Court in Ottawa gave a ruling, upholding an earlier Immigration Appeal Division (IAD) decision denying asylum to a Nigerian national Douglas Egharevba over his membership of the PDP and APC.

Court records had shown that Egharevba was a PDP member from 1999 to 2007 before joining the APC until 2017, when he relocated to Canada and disclosed his political history.

According to Canadian court filings, the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness argued that the two parties were implicated in political violence, electoral malpractice, and democratic subversion, citing incidents such as the PDP’s alleged role in the 2003 state elections issues and 2004 local government polls, which reportedly involved ballot stuffing, voter intimidation, as well as alleged killings of opposition supporters.

The IAD had concluded that party leadership benefited from the violence and took no action to stop it. According to the Court, this meets Canada’s legal definition of subversion under paragraph 34(1)(b.1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA).

Justice Ngo had consequently affirmed that under paragraph 34(1)(f), mere membership of such an organisation could trigger inadmissibility, even without proof of personal involvement.

Ad

Unlocking Opportunities in the Gulf of Guinea during UNGA80
X whatsapp